• 20Mar
    Posted by: Laura Thomas, ABC Categories: Issues, Social Media, communication Comments: 2

    This is a story about control, my control
    Control of what I say, control of what I do
    And this time I’m gonna do it my way
    -Janet Jackson

    One of the best things you can take away from listening to someone speak is a new way of looking at the world. A challenge to your assumptions is the the path to real learning.

    I thought I had a pretty good knowledge of online privacy issues. I also thought I’d read enough from researcher danah boyd that I didn’t really need to go listen to her keynote presentation at SXSWi. I was wrong. 

    For example, I’d never thought before about the difference between having someone ask you “ASL?” (age/sex/location) in a chat room, and having them go look up all that same information on you in an online profile. I would have thought someone asking me that in chat would be creepy, but now that I really think about it, it’s a little creepier when someone goes and finds those things out without asking you.

    And that’s the point danah was making - that privacy is not just about how much of our information is out there, but rather about how much we feel in control of the release of our information. If people feel they don’t have control, they feel violated.
    Control button on keyboard
    “Neither privacy nor publicity is dead, but technology will make a mess of both,” boyd said.

    Her rapid-fire speech was packed with great insight and I walked away realizing that I needed to challenge some of my own assumptions on the topic. One of the most interesting statistics I took away was around Facebook’s recent change to their privacy defaults. After the change, which rankled many, Facebook proudly told the FTC in December that about 40 percent of 220 million users made adjustments to their settings. That means however, as danah pointed out, about 262 million Facebook users made no change and all of their information defaulted to the most public settings.

    That probably includes many of our spouses, brothers, sisters, nieces, nephews, sons, daughters, fathers, mothers, and even grandmothers.

    But it’s not just Facebook that’s made recent privacy blunders. danah spent much of her time talking about what Google did wrong with their launch of Google Buzz.

    GigaOM reported afterwards that Buzz product manager Todd Jackson attended Boyd’s talk and found it “extremely insightful, fair and something we could work from.” He said he personally emailed Boyd afterwards and invited her to deliver the same talk at Google.

    That makes me hopeful that many of the other technology companies at SXSWi heard danah when she said “How you handle the challenges of privacy . . . will affect a generation. Make sure you are creating a world you want to live in.”

    Hopeful, but still cautious, that is. And mindful that those of us who are privileged enough (yes, privileged, unlike danah’s examples of illegal immigrants or abuse victims) to be able to live our lives in public need to do our part to educate our friends and families on how they can take control of their information online.

    And so, I leave you here with a little more musical flashback from someone who definitely knows what it means to live your life in public.

    Got my own mind
    I wanna make my own decisions
    When it has to do with my life, my life
    I wanna be the one in control
    -Janet Jackson

    Image credit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/fhashemi/ / CC BY 2.0

  • 08Mar
    Posted by: Laura Thomas, ABC Categories: General, Issues Comments: 2

    International Women’s Day logoThere are only a couple of hours left in International Women’s Day(IWD) as I sit down to write this post.

    I’d like to say I’m so behind because I was out doing something amazing like those on this list of 100 women who changed the world, but I was just making my way through an average day.

    An average day where I enjoyed the freedom to drive  to my job outside the home that pays me as well as my husband was paid in his last job. The job he left to spend the past year taking care of our daughter and our household. I came home to spend the evening relaxing and watching Chuck on television with that daughter who receives a great education in our public school system.

    A girl being educated. A man taking responsibility for helping to raise her while his wife works. A woman being paid as much as a man for equal work. All these are things I enjoy without thinking that much about it. So, it’s easy to wonder if we really need a day to press for equality and other women’s issues.

    I can agree with much that this woman who’s name I can’t find on her opinion piece on IWD in Rwanda:

    Now that most countries have come round to develope enabling policies and programs, more effort should be put into getting men to understand and appreciate this drive, as opposed to pushing it down their throats through affirmative action-one reason why, at the mention of the word gender, everyone automatically starts thinking ‘women’.

    I mean, do we really need someone to give flowers to the Spanish Equality Minister once a year just because she’s a woman?

    No, we do not. But, as long as there are places where girl’s aren’t receiving an education just because they’re girls. Or they’re being married off at age 10 and having their genitals mutilated (two of the women’s stories highlighted by Huffington Post today). Or women aren’t allowed to even drive, much less to a job. Or, women aren’t being compensated equal to men for equal work at that job.

    Then we still have work to do and a special day to remind us of that every year is a good thing.

  • 15Oct
    Posted by: Laura Thomas, ABC Categories: General, Issues Comments: 1

    Is it pure chance that President Obama and I are both in New Orleans on this Blog Action Day? Well, yes. But, on a day dedicated to blogging about climate change, its gives me reason to focus on my home state.

    The coastline of Louisiana and New Orleans itself are excellent examples of the effects climate change is having on us. Scientists say New Orleans and the barrier islands to the south will be severely affected by climate change due to rising sea levels and a growing intensity of hurricanes. It has been reported that between 10,000 and 13,500 square kilometers of coastal lands will drown due to rising sea levels and subsidence by 2100, a far greater loss than previous estimates.

    Rather than focus on the gloom and doom predictions, however, I thought today I would highlight a group that is doing something to not only rebuild what climate change has already damaged, but to also prevent additional environmental impact and improve people’s lives in the process.

    Founded in 1994 by activist and philanthropist Diane Meyer Simon, Global Green is the American Arm of Green Cross International (GCI), which was created by President Mikhail S. Gorbachev to foster a global value shift toward a sustainable and secure future by reconnecting humanity with the environment.

    Following Hurricane Katrina, Global Green set up an office in New Orleans where they now work to rebuild the city in a greener way. Global Green is working to address some of the greatest challenges facing humanity. In the United States our their work is primarily focused on stemming global climate change by creating green buildings and cities.

    Exterior of house - Global Green Holy Cross Project, New Orleans

    The Global Green Holy Cross Project is of vital importance to Global Green, the Holy Cross Neighborhood and the people of New Orleans. Success will show others that sustainable affordable housing is possible and will create a model that can be replicated by communities around the world.

    By utilizing multiple green and healthy building strategies, the Global Green Holy Cross Project seeks to reduce long-term operating costs from energy and water bills, create a healthier living environment by eliminating toxic materials, protect the environment through the use of sustainable materials and empower the people of the Lower 9th Ward to work toward a healthy and sustainable future.

    While many may debate the rebuilding of New Orleans at all, saying we are just “stubbornly clinging to the notion that we are the masters of our environment,” I fall into the camp of those who love the city and want to see it rise again.

    Global Green seems to be going about that in the right way, so I applaud their work and thank them for it here today.


    http://www.flickr.com/photos/sassycrafter/ / CC BY-NC-SA 2.0

  • 20Aug
    Posted by: Laura Thomas, ABC Categories: Issues Comments: 2

    The writing muse seems to have not been with me much lately, but she has definitely been with Nicholas D. Kristof and Sheryl WuDunn.

    The husband and wife team of reporters have a book “Half the Sky: Turning Oppression Into Opportunity for Women Worldwide” that will be published next month. Recently an essay adapted from it was part of a special edition of New York Times Magazine headlined “The Women’s Crusade ” that I think everyone should read.

    To pique your interest, I’ll throw out a few sentences from it:

    “The global statistics on the abuse of girls are numbing. It appears that more girls and women are now missing from the planet, precisely because they are female, than men were killed on the battlefield in all the wars of the 20th century.”

    “For all of India’s shiny new high-rises, a woman there still has a 1-in-70 lifetime chance of dying in childbirth. In contrast, the lifetime risk in the United States is 1 in 4,800; in Ireland, it is 1 in 47,600.”

    “In many poor countries, the greatest unexploited resource isn’t oil fields or veins of gold; it is the women and girls who aren’t educated and never become a major presence in the formal economy.”

    “Strange as it may seem, sweatshops in Asia had the effect of empowering women.”

    “A series of studies has found that when women hold assets or gain incomes, family money is more likely to be spent on nutrition, medicine and housing, and consequently children are healthier.”

    “’Gender inequality hurts economic growth,’ Goldman Sachs concluded in a 2008 research report that emphasized how much developing countries could improve their economic performance by educating girls.”

    If you recall my Blog Action Day 2009 post, you’ll know that this is something that strikes me as such a common sense way of battling global poverty that I can’t believe we aren’t doing even more to support those girls.

    While Kristof and WuDunn present their own ideas of proposals that President Obama shoudl adopt as part of his foreign-aid policy, I’ll throw out some links to organizations that you can support today to make a difference:

    BRAC

    Afghan Institute of Learning

    Campaign for Female Education (Camfed)

    Family Care International

    Hunger Project

    Pro Mujer

    globalgiving

    I’m no charitynavigator.org or givewell.net, so feel free to visit those sites for more information about aid groups.  I’m also certain there are many more that focus on girls and women than I’ve listed above. Please share your favorites in the comments.

  • 06Mar
    Posted by: Laura Thomas, ABC Categories: Austin, General, Issues, Social Media Comments: 0

    Pledge to End HungerIf someone told you that you could help feed hungry children without opening your pocketbook, handing out a sandwich or even leaving your house, would you believe it?

    Well, it’s true.  While your donations of money or time as a volunteer would certainly be appreciated, all you have to do to see that 140,000 meals are served to Central Texas children in need is pledge to spread the word about Pledge to End Hunger.

    For each pledge made via the online form, Tyson Foods, Inc. will donate 35 lbs of food product — the equivalent of 140 servings. You type your name, your e-mail (that will only be used to update you on the progress of the campaign) and select your state, then hit submit. It’s really that easy.

    Fulfilling your pledge simply means talking about this with your friends and family. You can do that face-to-face, on the phone, via e-mail, Twitter, Facebook, MySpace, your blog, a billboard, skywriting … well, you get the picture.

    If the goal of 1,000 people taking the online pledge is reached, a semi-trailer filled with 140,000 meals will arrive at the Capital Area Food Bank of Texas in Austin during the SXSW ’09 Interactive Festival.


    Bookmark and Share

  • 23Oct
    Posted by: Laura Thomas, ABC Categories: General, Issues Comments: 0

    On October 15, Blog Action Day, more than 12,000 bloggers banded together to discuss the issue of poverty. It was so nice to receive the following e-mail update after my own post that day, that I wanted to share it with you all:

    Dear Laura,

    Thank you so much for your gift of $50 as well as your recent blog post about BRAC’s initiative with the Girl Effect. We appreciate your support of our work and your desire to alleviate poverty and empower the poor.

    The incredible support we’ve gotten for our programs to empower young girls has already enabled BRAC to set up 36 clubs in Uganda, reaching nearly 800 girls and providing them with the training and support they need to improve their lives and their communities. I’ve attached a photo from one of the meetings of the clubs in Uganda, where the girls try to teach Country Manager Arif Islam some new dance moves!

    BRAC Girls in Uganda

    Now, we’re piloting the same initiative in Tanzania, and I invite you to take a look at our project on Global Giving.

    Together we strive towards a common mission: to end absolute poverty in Africa and Asia, through holistic development programs carried out by BRAC, the largest non-profit in the world. BRAC focuses on microfinance, health, education, and social justice, and is the world’s first international development organization initiated and led by people from the developing world with solidarity and support from the developed world.

    Best wishes,

    Susan Davis

    BRAC USA, Inc. is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation. All contributions are tax deductible as allowed by the IRS. No goods, services or benefits were provided to the donor in conjunction with this donation.

    BRAC USA

    11 East 44th St., Suite 1600

    New York, NY 10017

    Tel: 212-808-5615
    Fax: 212-808-0203

    Website: www.brac.net/usa

    BRAC Blog: blog4brac.blogspot.com

    You Tube: www.youtube.com/user/bracusa1



    Bookmark and Share

  • 15Oct
    Posted by: Laura Thomas, ABC Categories: Austin, Family, General, Issues Comments: 8

    Poverty is bad. How’s that for over-simplification of a complex issue?

    But, poverty’s impact is felt even harder by girls. What do I mean? Take a moment to let these tidbits sink in:

    • Approximately one-quarter of girls in developing countries are not in school. (Cynthia B. Lloyd, ed., Growing Up Global: The Changing Transitions to Adulthood in Developing Countries [Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2005].)
    • In Nicaragua, 45 percent of girls with no schooling are married before age 18 versus only 16 percent of their educated counterparts. In Mozambique, the figures are 60 percent versus 10; in Senegal, 41 percent versus 6. (International Center for Research on Women, Too Young to Wed: Education & Action Toward Ending Child Marriage, http://www.icrw.org/docs/2006_cmtoolkit/cm_all.pdf [2007].
    • Medical complications from pregnancy are the leading cause of death among girls ages 15 to 19 worldwide. (United Nations Children’s Fund, Equality, Development and Peace, http://www.unicef.org/publications/files/pub_equality_en.pdf [New York: UNICEF, 2000], 19.
    • 75 percent of 15- to 24-year-olds living with HIV in Africa are female, up from 62 percent in 2001. (Global Coalition on Women and AIDS, Keeping the Promise: An Agenda for Action on Women and AIDS, http://data.unaids.org/pub/Booklet/2006/20060530_FS_Keeping_Promise_en.pdf [2006a].)
    • The total global population of girls ages 10 to 24—already the largest in history—is expected to peak in the next decade. (Ruth Levine et al., Girls Count: A Global Investment & Action Agenda [Washington, D.C.: Center for Global Development, 2008].)

    Now, watch this video. Really. Do it before you read more.

    Then, just a couple of more facts to chew on:

    • An extra year of primary school boosts girls’ eventual wages by 10 to 20 percent. An extra year of secondary school: 15 to 25 percent. (George Psacharopoulos and Harry Anthony Patrinos, “Returns to Investment in Education: A Further Update,” Policy Research Working Paper 2881 [Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 2002].)
    • When women and girls earn income, they reinvest 90 percent of it into their families, as compared to only 30 to 40 percent for a man. (Phil Borges, with foreword by Madeleine Albright, Women Empowered: Inspiring Change in the Emerging World [New York: Rizzoli, 2007], 13.)

    So what is one person like you or I supposed to do to impact that? The Girl Effect campaign directs us to some great resources, including globalgiving. Globalgiving connects you to more than 450 pre-screened grassroots charity projects around the world. You can feel confident that your money is being put to good use because projects on globalgiving undergo compliance checks to ensure they have a bona fide charitable purpose and meet applicable laws relating to international philanthropy (sort of like giving through United Way). The organization also has some interesting volunteer opportunities for writers, photographers and web developers.

    BRAC is “one of the pioneering implementers of the Girl Effect” and an organization nearly as old as myself founded in Bangladesh in 1972. Its focus is on long-term sustainable poverty reduction and BRAC reaches more than 110 million people with their development interventions in Asia and Africa. Their newest project in Uganda and Tanzania provides safe spaces, informal education and micro loans to girls, which will help them lead confident, self-reliant and dignified lives. As little as a $50 donation to BRAC could provide a loan for a girl to start a business of her own, so that was my first contribution today.

    Then I contemplated the work of several local bloggers today who are focusing on poverty in Austin – should I be following the Think Global, Act Local style of participation and look for a volunteer opportunity in my home town? Or do I worry less about acts of volunteerism and more about the city’s I live here, I give here campaign?

    In the end, I think I have to do a little of both. So, I also made a donation to the Capital Area Food Bank where every $5 donated provides $20 worth of nutritious food to Central Texas families; and, I enlisted my own girl to participate in their “Hunger is Unacceptable” meme:

    Hunger is Unacceptable

    It was a great opportunity to initiate a conversation with her about just what poverty is, but I’m not sure it really sunk into her 6-year-old brain. So, I’m also going to look into some of the volunteer opportunities at Mobile Loaves and Fishes that we can do together to help make it real for her.

    Hopefully, it will be the start of our own Girl Effect.


    Bookmark and Share

  • 29Sep
    Posted by: Laura Thomas, ABC Categories: General, Issues Comments: 2

    Since reading is what I usually list when asked for a hobby, and I’m the daughter of a librarian, and I live in Texas (the Round Rock school district even), it’s no wonder that Banned Books Week jumped out at me as something to mention here. It’s held every year in the last week of September – that’s this week!

    So, I started digging around online for more information.

    A challenge is defined as a formal, written complaint, filed with a library or school, requesting that materials be removed because of content or appropriateness. So why would someone challenge a book about penguins? Reasons given were: Anti-Ethnic, Sexism, Homosexuality, Anti-Family, Religious Viewpoint, Unsuited to Age Group.

    Now, I’m not necessarily ready for my six-year-old daughter to go check out Forever or even Are You There God, It’s Me Margaret (both frequently challenged books many times over the years); but, I’m certainly glad both titles by Judy Blume were available in my junior high school library growing up. And when she does get to an age where she’s learning about her sexuality, I expect book authors will fill in some of the holes I miss or she’s too uncomfortable to ask about even after we talk about the subject. That’s the way it worked for me growing up.

    Speaking of Judy Blume and my youth, it turns out that my very favorite book of hers, Tiger Eyes, was actually self-censored by the author, and yet still turns up on the American Library Association list of the 100 Most Frequently Challenged Books of 1990-2000.

    Some of the other books I’ve read that have faced challenges over the years include A Wrinkle in Time, To Kill a Mockingbird, The Outsiders, Brave New World, Sleeping Beauty Trilogy (ok, so that one I probably wouldn’t want in the school library), Cujo, James and the Giant Peach, Carrie, Where’s Waldo (really? That was challenged?) and the classic, How to Eat Fried Worms.

    And there are many more that I should have read that have been challenged, such as: I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, Of Mice and Men, Bridge to Terabithia, The Catcher in the Rye, Ordinary People, Slaughterhouse-Five, Lord of the Flies and The Adventures of Tom Sawyer, just to name a few.

    So, in honor of Banned Books Week, I’m going to go out and read one of them. Check the list for one that you’ve been missing in your personal library and join me!
    [UPDATE]
    Well, my Barnes & Noble didn’t have the penguin book, but I was able to find out it is a picture book. Somehow I doubt the illustrations put the two male penguins in any particularly compromising positions, but will keep my eye out for a copy to make sure. <wink>

    Instead, I went with Bridge to Terabithia, a book that made the “10 Most Challenged” list in 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 2002 and 2003. I’m guessing it has been on that list even more since it was first published in 1977 (and won a Newbery Medal in 1978), but that’s as far back as I could find records. It has apparently been challenged for using offensive language and promoting Satanism.

    Were the people who said that reading the same book I read?!

    Bookmark and Share